shadowfax0
Oct 26, 08:31 PM
...The old PB G3's were able to have 2 batteries, so I guess it was jsut for backwards compatibility. I'd love it if the new ones were able to as well...
turbobass
May 4, 01:37 PM
May be because 10.6.7 has different drivers for the 3D acceleration? Still, don't understand why it won't update...there's your problem right there!
:o
:o
v66jack
Mar 8, 04:30 PM
Pretty sure Microsoft wouldn't admit to holding every single conversation. I presume once they have obtained all the data they want from your conversation they delete it. But I'm no expert.
Coleman2010
Apr 27, 08:22 PM
In glen cove, long island, so iPad would have to be re synced on their comp?
I think I'd have to enter my password for the app on his computer to synch it. Then sign out.
I think I'd have to enter my password for the app on his computer to synch it. Then sign out.
Mr. Retrofire
Oct 20, 07:06 PM
What we need is Mac OS X 10.6.5!
;-)
;-)
George Knighton
Oct 30, 07:34 AM
Completely misleading. iPad runs a mobile OS that's much less CPU intensive. The iPad is not five times slower in performing everyday tasks like web browsing, e-mail, word processing, etc.
I agree with you that for many of us who need only light use at work every day, the iPad is every bit the competitor to a lightweight net book type of device.
With these kinds of light, but urgent needs, the iPad can be a lot quicker to use than a netbook. It powers up instantly and allows you to to work quickly, then shuts down easily and quickly to allow you to get on with whatever else it was that you were doing in the field.
I'm not saying it replaces a net book or laptop for all of us or even most of us, but if your main purpose on a particular day makes carrying a heavier device difficult, or you are in the field and need something ultimately portable and sturdy, the iPad is a great thing to have around.
We're lucky we have so many great products to pick from, whether you're in the Apple camp or somebody else's camp.
I agree with you that for many of us who need only light use at work every day, the iPad is every bit the competitor to a lightweight net book type of device.
With these kinds of light, but urgent needs, the iPad can be a lot quicker to use than a netbook. It powers up instantly and allows you to to work quickly, then shuts down easily and quickly to allow you to get on with whatever else it was that you were doing in the field.
I'm not saying it replaces a net book or laptop for all of us or even most of us, but if your main purpose on a particular day makes carrying a heavier device difficult, or you are in the field and need something ultimately portable and sturdy, the iPad is a great thing to have around.
We're lucky we have so many great products to pick from, whether you're in the Apple camp or somebody else's camp.
Bluemeanie1976
Nov 6, 09:04 PM
http://img.skitch.com/20101107-xmu9y76q8jp4pedbukjeqncu1s.jpg
[http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1084/5103082925_58b2c46836.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/350gt/5103082925/)
photo 2.PNG (http://www.flickr.com/photos/350gt/5103082925/) by 350GT (http://www.flickr.com/people/350gt/), on Flickr
And
http://img.skitch.com/20101107-ctns3tdxunf19c7sqynbfyhsrp.jpg
[http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1084/5103082925_58b2c46836.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/350gt/5103082925/)
photo 2.PNG (http://www.flickr.com/photos/350gt/5103082925/) by 350GT (http://www.flickr.com/people/350gt/), on Flickr
And
http://img.skitch.com/20101107-ctns3tdxunf19c7sqynbfyhsrp.jpg
mc68k
May 6, 12:31 PM
i wonder if a single processor machine that repeatedly requests core82 and never gets it just hangs forever?
that would suck for the whole project
that would suck for the whole project
Joshuarocks
Apr 5, 12:10 PM
Only the quad has it from the last few months. Mines working perfectly, I'm not about to pull it apart for pictures.
Does it resemble that of the two big black boxed one? Thats the one I have, but having had this Quad 2.5 years back I never had problems with it. I also read that the Quad's failure rating is around 1 percent compared to the dual 2.5 from 2004 and dual 2.7 from early 2005 - am I correct?
Does it resemble that of the two big black boxed one? Thats the one I have, but having had this Quad 2.5 years back I never had problems with it. I also read that the Quad's failure rating is around 1 percent compared to the dual 2.5 from 2004 and dual 2.7 from early 2005 - am I correct?
barny
Jan 15, 11:53 AM
I tried everything to get it to change on 4.2.1 but still havnt found anything. Surely there is some way??!
Macwick
Mar 14, 04:54 PM
Say what you will about the Zune - I had one 5 years ago and it did something mindblowingly advanced that the iPod/iPhone/iPad still cannot do - wireless sync.
<sigh>
<sigh>
norV
Apr 17, 01:15 PM
Check your trash folder. I just fished out my 1.0 version from there. Damn cablevision strikes again.
PS: Just confirmed that cablevision are as@@@@@es. New version DOESN'T work over VPN. Back to old version.
what do you mean the trash folder? from where?
PS: Just confirmed that cablevision are as@@@@@es. New version DOESN'T work over VPN. Back to old version.
what do you mean the trash folder? from where?
ten-oak-druid
Apr 21, 09:37 AM
The stock market is benefitting from AAPL. I think the revision of AAPL's influence on the market will be reevaluated again.
catracho
May 6, 10:20 PM
Hope more Apple products could be made in Brazil and export to the rest of Latin America.
Its a shame that only Mexico and Brazil have Apple Online Stores. Cmon Apple its 2011!
Its a shame that only Mexico and Brazil have Apple Online Stores. Cmon Apple its 2011!
paperhearts63
Nov 22, 11:46 PM
http://longsummernights.deviantart.com/
ssdeg7
Mar 18, 06:41 PM
But I have another account with credit, I just use this account to download free apps because it is MY account and i've been downloading apps since a long time ago, I don't want to have money on it or a credit card.
I've sent an email to iTunes support, lets hope somebody does something about it, although I doubt it.
I've sent an email to iTunes support, lets hope somebody does something about it, although I doubt it.
Sydde
Apr 22, 11:49 PM
From what you are showing, it looks like an array of either NSNumbers or NSStrings. You might try concatenating the values in the array together to form a block of data that NSImage would be able to convert.
If it is NSNumbers, you should be able to just walk a pointer through a data block for each number. If it is hex-encoded strings, you would have to use a NSScanner to convert them to numbers (-scanHexInt:).
If it is NSNumbers, you should be able to just walk a pointer through a data block for each number. If it is hex-encoded strings, you would have to use a NSScanner to convert them to numbers (-scanHexInt:).
IJ Reilly
Oct 12, 03:41 PM
(1) Not even close to every machine ships with a productivity suite... in fact, if you look closely at what you're paying for when you buy most PC machines, those products that "ship standard" with your fancy new PC are built into the price. Most customizable online shops (Dell, et al.) allow you to remove that software and lower the price. So obviously, they are not free.
(2) iWork is undoubtably being groomed as a direct competitor to Office. There's no disputing that. It CURRENTLY is a replacement for AppleWorks, because it's still young and undeveloped in places, but it would be insane for Apple not to try and pursue part of the Office marketshare. It's an untapped resource, and frankly the Office programs are not very well constructed (with the exception of Excel). Outlook, Word, and PowerPoint are pretty lousy, and while Access is solid, it's certainly not leaps and bounds better than (PageMaker) <-- EDIT: Sorry, meant FileMaker.
(3) Bundling software, and then looking for profit on the backend with upgrades is a reasonable answer to the question. There's something to be said for that. But in the end, I think you're comparing Apples and Oranges. While at current, iWork is undeveloped, it is (as I said) being groomed to be a full suite of productivity Apps. iLife is a wonderful package of Apps, but they do not replace Pro Apps. iPhoto is garbage compared to Aperture or Photoshop. Pages is certainly not garbage compared to Word, and Keynote is already a much better App than PowerPoint. So I think there's a flaw in the argument here...
This impresses me as distinctions without much a difference. The iLife suite now consists of several well-developed applications all of which are bundled. They didn't necessarily start out mature but they grew into maturity. (iPhoto was never conceived as a replacement for Photoshop btw.) Apple got Mac users accustomed to using them and can now successfully charge for upgrades. They could do the same with iWork.
(2) iWork is undoubtably being groomed as a direct competitor to Office. There's no disputing that. It CURRENTLY is a replacement for AppleWorks, because it's still young and undeveloped in places, but it would be insane for Apple not to try and pursue part of the Office marketshare. It's an untapped resource, and frankly the Office programs are not very well constructed (with the exception of Excel). Outlook, Word, and PowerPoint are pretty lousy, and while Access is solid, it's certainly not leaps and bounds better than (PageMaker) <-- EDIT: Sorry, meant FileMaker.
(3) Bundling software, and then looking for profit on the backend with upgrades is a reasonable answer to the question. There's something to be said for that. But in the end, I think you're comparing Apples and Oranges. While at current, iWork is undeveloped, it is (as I said) being groomed to be a full suite of productivity Apps. iLife is a wonderful package of Apps, but they do not replace Pro Apps. iPhoto is garbage compared to Aperture or Photoshop. Pages is certainly not garbage compared to Word, and Keynote is already a much better App than PowerPoint. So I think there's a flaw in the argument here...
This impresses me as distinctions without much a difference. The iLife suite now consists of several well-developed applications all of which are bundled. They didn't necessarily start out mature but they grew into maturity. (iPhoto was never conceived as a replacement for Photoshop btw.) Apple got Mac users accustomed to using them and can now successfully charge for upgrades. They could do the same with iWork.
eswank
May 1, 01:51 PM
#15 through #17 in this (http://web.me.com/pondini/Time_Machine/FAQ.html) user tip may prove informative.
This is the post that helped me. :p Thanks!
This is the post that helped me. :p Thanks!
4JNA
Apr 4, 11:12 PM
good to be back.
damn dude... :eek:date = 03.30.08 points = 21,937 work units = 16
don't care if it's just servers/credit catching up, 22k in one day is cool no matter what! :D great job.
damn dude... :eek:date = 03.30.08 points = 21,937 work units = 16
don't care if it's just servers/credit catching up, 22k in one day is cool no matter what! :D great job.
twoodcc
Oct 8, 07:21 AM
well this sounds good and all, but as long as cingular has the iphone as well, i'm covered
R94N
Nov 11, 01:09 PM
Interfacelift seems to be a very popular site for backgrounds. Vladstudio is good but it doesn't really get updated very often; but I suppose Interfacelift has lots of different people's work on it.
holyindian
Mar 21, 02:28 PM
Half the day has passed. nothing yet!! :confused:
Peterkro
Feb 27, 10:23 AM
The US signed the treaty too.
Clinton signed Bush unsigned.:rolleyes:
I think in 2017 wars of aggression will come under the treaty,something that would have seen both Bushes,Blair,Clinton and many others hauled in front of the court.
Clinton signed Bush unsigned.:rolleyes:
I think in 2017 wars of aggression will come under the treaty,something that would have seen both Bushes,Blair,Clinton and many others hauled in front of the court.
No comments:
Post a Comment